Prototype · schema v1
Who can actually govern frontier AI?
A small, inspectable atlas of institutions, laws and coordination mechanisms. Every material claim and relationship carries evidence, confidence and a verification date.
- Entities
- 20
- Relationships
- 14
- Current profiles
- 20/20
Deliberately incomplete.This prototype covers a tested seed set, not “all AI governance.” Stale evidence is shown rather than hidden.
Organisation Instrument Mechanism / process Formal authority Operational / informal Verification older than 180 days
Keyboard-accessible entity index
- AI Safety Framework 2.0 — Artificial Intelligence Safety Governance Framework, Version 2.0
- CAC — Cyberspace Administration of China
- CAICT — China Academy of Information and Communications Technology
- Cal OES — California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
- California AG — Attorney General of California
- California SB 53 — Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act
- CoE AI Convention — Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law
- EU AI Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence
- EU AI Office — European Artificial Intelligence Office
- G7 HAP — G7 Hiroshima Artificial Intelligence Process
- HAIP Reporting — Hiroshima AI Process Reporting Framework
- ISO/IEC SC 42 — ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1, Subcommittee 42: Artificial intelligence
- Measurement Network — International Network for Advanced AI Measurement, Evaluation, and Science
- NIST — National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Shanghai AI Lab — Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
- TC260 — National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee
- UK AISI — United Kingdom Artificial Intelligence Security Institute
- UN AI Panel — Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence
- UN Global Dialogue — Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance
- US CAISI — Center for AI Standards and Innovation