{ "schema_version": 1, "generated_at": "2026-07-27T17:13:43.117Z", "entities": [ { "schema_version": 1, "id": "china-ai-safety-framework-2", "slug": "china-ai-safety-framework-2", "short_name": "AI Safety Framework 2.0", "kind": "instrument", "jurisdiction": "china", "aliases": [ "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0", "人工智能安全治理框架2.0版" ], "official_url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "functions": [ "advice", "standardisation", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "loss_of_control", "cbrn", "cyber", "open_weights", "model_security", "content", "data" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": false, "rationale": "The framework expressly addresses foundation-model and catastrophic AI risks and supplies a state-backed technical governance blueprint." }, "claims": [ { "id": "china-framework-2-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Governance Framework, Version 2.0", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the translated title of the official document.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "china-framework-2-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A state-backed technical blueprint classifying AI risks and recommending lifecycle measures for technical, application and broader societal risks, including severe loss-of-control scenarios.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The document presents risk categories, grading concepts and governance measures.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "china-framework-2-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "non-binding technical framework", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The release describes it as a TC260 technical document rather than a law or administrative regulation.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "china-framework-2-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Artificial Intelligence Safety Governance Framework, Version 2.0", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the translated title of the official document.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "china-framework-2-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A state-backed technical blueprint classifying AI risks and recommending lifecycle measures for technical, application and broader societal risks, including severe loss-of-control scenarios.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The document presents risk categories, grading concepts and governance measures.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "china-framework-2-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "non-binding technical framework", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The release describes it as a TC260 technical document rather than a law or administrative regulation.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "latest_update": { "schema_version": 1, "id": "2025-09-15-china-framework-2-release", "subjects": [ "china-ai-safety-framework-2", "cac", "tc260" ], "event_date": "2025-09-15", "published_date": "2025-09-15", "title": "China releases AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0", "summary": "Version 2.0 updated China's state-backed technical risk taxonomy, introduced a qualitative risk-grading approach and revised proposed governance measures.", "selection_reason": "official_policy", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "generated_on": "2026-07-27", "review_status": "reviewed", "stale_after": "2026-03-15", "changes_stable_fact": true }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "cac", "slug": "cac", "short_name": "CAC", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "china", "aliases": [ "Cyberspace Administration of China", "国家互联网信息办公室" ], "official_url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/", "functions": [ "regulation", "enforcement", "standardisation", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "cyber", "content", "data", "model_security", "transparency" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "CAC guides and enforces binding rules affecting generative and general-purpose AI services and directs relevant technical governance work." }, "claims": [ { "id": "cac-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Cyberspace Administration of China", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the body's standard English name.", "sources": [ { "title": "Cyberspace Administration of China", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "cac-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "China's central cyberspace regulator and Party-state coordination body for online content, data, algorithms and cybersecurity, including binding generative-AI service rules.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "CAC's official acts and institutional role establish these functions.", "sources": [ { "title": "Interim Measures for Generative AI Services", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "cac-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "issue and co-issue administrative rules", "security assessment", "algorithm filing oversight", "content and data enforcement", "standards guidance" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These powers are reflected in CAC-administered AI, algorithm and cybersecurity measures.", "sources": [ { "title": "Interim Measures for Generative AI Services", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "cac-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "party-state, administrative and campaign-capable governance", "evidence_status": "inferred", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "CAC combines state regulatory functions with institutional leadership embedded in the Chinese Communist Party's cyberspace system.", "sources": [ { "title": "Cyberspace Administration of China", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "cac-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Cyberspace Administration of China", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the body's standard English name.", "sources": [ { "title": "Cyberspace Administration of China", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "cac-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "China's central cyberspace regulator and Party-state coordination body for online content, data, algorithms and cybersecurity, including binding generative-AI service rules.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "CAC's official acts and institutional role establish these functions.", "sources": [ { "title": "Interim Measures for Generative AI Services", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "formal_powers": { "id": "cac-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "issue and co-issue administrative rules", "security assessment", "algorithm filing oversight", "content and data enforcement", "standards guidance" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These powers are reflected in CAC-administered AI, algorithm and cybersecurity measures.", "sources": [ { "title": "Interim Measures for Generative AI Services", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "governance_mode": { "id": "cac-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "party-state, administrative and campaign-capable governance", "evidence_status": "inferred", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "CAC combines state regulatory functions with institutional leadership embedded in the Chinese Communist Party's cyberspace system.", "sources": [ { "title": "Cyberspace Administration of China", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "latest_update": { "schema_version": 1, "id": "2025-09-15-china-framework-2-release", "subjects": [ "china-ai-safety-framework-2", "cac", "tc260" ], "event_date": "2025-09-15", "published_date": "2025-09-15", "title": "China releases AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0", "summary": "Version 2.0 updated China's state-backed technical risk taxonomy, introduced a qualitative risk-grading approach and revised proposed governance measures.", "selection_reason": "official_policy", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "generated_on": "2026-07-27", "review_status": "reviewed", "stale_after": "2026-03-15", "changes_stable_fact": true }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "caict", "slug": "caict", "short_name": "CAICT", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "china", "aliases": [ "China Academy of Information and Communications Technology", "中国信息通信研究院" ], "official_url": "https://www.caict.ac.cn/english/", "functions": [ "research", "evaluation", "standardisation", "advice", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "cyber", "model_security", "standards", "transparency" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The MIIT-subordinate institute conducts foundation-model testing and develops standards and policy advice with direct industry application." }, "claims": [ { "id": "caict-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "China Academy of Information and Communications Technology", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the institute's official English name.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAICT", "url": "https://www.caict.ac.cn/english/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "caict-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A research institute directly subordinate to China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, providing policy research, testing, standards and industry coordination.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "CAICT's institutional description identifies its ministerial subordination and government-and-industry functions.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAICT", "url": "https://www.caict.ac.cn/english/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "caict-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "ministerial research, technical testing and industry coordination", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "CAICT supports public policy and industrial development but is not itself the rule-making ministry.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAICT", "url": "https://www.caict.ac.cn/english/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "caict-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "China Academy of Information and Communications Technology", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the institute's official English name.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAICT", "url": "https://www.caict.ac.cn/english/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "caict-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A research institute directly subordinate to China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, providing policy research, testing, standards and industry coordination.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "CAICT's institutional description identifies its ministerial subordination and government-and-industry functions.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAICT", "url": "https://www.caict.ac.cn/english/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "governance_mode": { "id": "caict-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "ministerial research, technical testing and industry coordination", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "CAICT supports public policy and industrial development but is not itself the rule-making ministry.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAICT", "url": "https://www.caict.ac.cn/english/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "cal-oes", "slug": "cal-oes", "short_name": "Cal OES", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "california", "aliases": [ "California Governor's Office of Emergency Services", "OES" ], "official_url": "https://www.caloes.ca.gov/", "functions": [ "incident_response", "reporting", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "incident_learning", "loss_of_control", "cbrn", "cyber" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": false, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "SB 53 assigns Cal OES a direct role receiving and handling critical frontier-AI incident reports and risk summaries." }, "claims": [ { "id": "cal-oes-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "California Governor's Office of Emergency Services", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the agency's official name.", "sources": [ { "title": "Cal OES", "url": "https://www.caloes.ca.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "cal-oes-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "California's emergency-management agency; SB 53 gives it an AI-specific role as the protected recipient and reviewer of critical safety incident reports and risk summaries.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The general agency role comes from its official site and the AI function from SB 53.", "sources": [ { "title": "Cal OES", "url": "https://www.caloes.ca.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" }, { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "cal-oes-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "receive protected AI incident reports", "review risk summaries", "publish anonymised aggregate information", "share relevant information with public authorities" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These functions are assigned by SB 53; they do not amount to continuous model supervision.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "cal-oes-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "California Governor's Office of Emergency Services", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the agency's official name.", "sources": [ { "title": "Cal OES", "url": "https://www.caloes.ca.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "cal-oes-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "California's emergency-management agency; SB 53 gives it an AI-specific role as the protected recipient and reviewer of critical safety incident reports and risk summaries.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The general agency role comes from its official site and the AI function from SB 53.", "sources": [ { "title": "Cal OES", "url": "https://www.caloes.ca.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" }, { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "formal_powers": { "id": "cal-oes-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "receive protected AI incident reports", "review risk summaries", "publish anonymised aggregate information", "share relevant information with public authorities" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These functions are assigned by SB 53; they do not amount to continuous model supervision.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "california-ag", "slug": "california-ag", "short_name": "California AG", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "california", "aliases": [ "Attorney General of California", "California Department of Justice" ], "official_url": "https://oag.ca.gov/", "functions": [ "enforcement", "regulation" ], "issues": [ "transparency", "incident_learning", "model_security" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": false, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "SB 53 gives the Attorney General civil enforcement authority over specified frontier-AI obligations." }, "claims": [ { "id": "california-ag-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Attorney General of California", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the office's constitutional title.", "sources": [ { "title": "California Department of Justice", "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "california-ag-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "California's chief legal officer and civil enforcer of SB 53, including authority to investigate violations and seek statutory penalties.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The office's general role and SB 53's enforcement provisions support this description.", "sources": [ { "title": "California Department of Justice", "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" }, { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "california-ag-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "investigate", "bring civil actions", "seek civil penalties", "receive protected disclosures" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These are the relevant enforcement functions under SB 53.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "california-ag-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Attorney General of California", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the office's constitutional title.", "sources": [ { "title": "California Department of Justice", "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "california-ag-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "California's chief legal officer and civil enforcer of SB 53, including authority to investigate violations and seek statutory penalties.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The office's general role and SB 53's enforcement provisions support this description.", "sources": [ { "title": "California Department of Justice", "url": "https://oag.ca.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" }, { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "formal_powers": { "id": "california-ag-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "investigate", "bring civil actions", "seek civil penalties", "receive protected disclosures" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These are the relevant enforcement functions under SB 53.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "california-sb53", "slug": "california-sb53", "short_name": "California SB 53", "kind": "instrument", "jurisdiction": "california", "aliases": [ "Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act" ], "official_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "functions": [ "legislation", "regulation", "enforcement", "reporting" ], "issues": [ "loss_of_control", "cbrn", "cyber", "model_security", "transparency", "incident_learning" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The statute expressly covers frontier developers and requires risk-framework transparency, incident reporting and enforceable compliance." }, "claims": [ { "id": "california-sb53-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the enacted statute's title.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "california-sb53-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "California law requiring covered frontier developers to publish and follow risk-management frameworks, report critical safety incidents and protect specified whistleblowers.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These are the central operative duties in the statutory text.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "california-sb53-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "binding state law", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The measure was enacted into California law and specifies civil enforcement.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "california-sb53-reach", "field": "reach", "value": "Covered frontier-model developers meeting the statute's model and company thresholds, with obligations tied to specified development and deployment conduct.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The statute defines frontier models, large developers and covered duties.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "california-sb53-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the enacted statute's title.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "california-sb53-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "California law requiring covered frontier developers to publish and follow risk-management frameworks, report critical safety incidents and protect specified whistleblowers.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These are the central operative duties in the statutory text.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "california-sb53-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "binding state law", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The measure was enacted into California law and specifies civil enforcement.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "reach": { "id": "california-sb53-reach", "field": "reach", "value": "Covered frontier-model developers meeting the statute's model and company thresholds, with obligations tied to specified development and deployment conduct.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The statute defines frontier models, large developers and covered duties.", "sources": [ { "title": "California SB 53 text", "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB53", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "coe-ai-convention", "slug": "coe-ai-convention", "short_name": "CoE AI Convention", "kind": "instrument", "jurisdiction": "global", "aliases": [ "Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law", "CETS No. 225" ], "official_url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence", "functions": [ "negotiation", "legislation", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "fundamental_rights", "transparency", "data" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": false, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The treaty establishes legally binding lifecycle principles applicable to public authorities and private actors, with material relevance to frontier-model deployment." }, "claims": [ { "id": "coe-convention-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the treaty's official title.", "sources": [ { "title": "Council of Europe AI Convention", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence", "source_type": "treaty_depositary" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "coe-convention-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "The first international treaty framework addressing AI throughout its lifecycle through human-rights, democracy and rule-of-law obligations, implemented by parties through domestic measures.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The Council of Europe describes this scope and implementation structure.", "sources": [ { "title": "Council of Europe AI Convention", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence", "source_type": "treaty_depositary" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "coe-convention-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "binding treaty for parties after entry into force, subject to its scope provisions, declarations and domestic implementation", "evidence_status": "contested", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Its treaty character is clear, but the practical extent of binding effect varies with scope choices, exclusions and implementation.", "sources": [ { "title": "CETS No. 225 treaty page", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=225", "source_type": "treaty_depositary" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "coe-convention-membership", "field": "membership", "value": "Open to Council of Europe members, participating non-member states and other states invited under the Convention's accession provisions.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The treaty text and depositary page define signature and accession routes.", "sources": [ { "title": "CETS No. 225 treaty page", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=225", "source_type": "treaty_depositary" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "coe-convention-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the treaty's official title.", "sources": [ { "title": "Council of Europe AI Convention", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence", "source_type": "treaty_depositary" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "coe-convention-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "The first international treaty framework addressing AI throughout its lifecycle through human-rights, democracy and rule-of-law obligations, implemented by parties through domestic measures.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The Council of Europe describes this scope and implementation structure.", "sources": [ { "title": "Council of Europe AI Convention", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/the-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligence", "source_type": "treaty_depositary" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "coe-convention-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "binding treaty for parties after entry into force, subject to its scope provisions, declarations and domestic implementation", "evidence_status": "contested", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Its treaty character is clear, but the practical extent of binding effect varies with scope choices, exclusions and implementation.", "sources": [ { "title": "CETS No. 225 treaty page", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=225", "source_type": "treaty_depositary" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "membership": { "id": "coe-convention-membership", "field": "membership", "value": "Open to Council of Europe members, participating non-member states and other states invited under the Convention's accession provisions.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The treaty text and depositary page define signature and accession routes.", "sources": [ { "title": "CETS No. 225 treaty page", "url": "https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=225", "source_type": "treaty_depositary" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "eu-ai-act", "slug": "eu-ai-act", "short_name": "EU AI Act", "kind": "instrument", "jurisdiction": "eu", "aliases": [ "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689", "AI Act" ], "official_url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng", "functions": [ "legislation", "regulation", "enforcement" ], "issues": [ "loss_of_control", "cbrn", "cyber", "model_security", "transparency", "fundamental_rights", "incident_learning" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The regulation expressly governs general-purpose AI models and creates obligations at evaluation, deployment and incident-reporting control points." }, "claims": [ { "id": "eu-ai-act-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The title is taken from the Official Journal text.", "sources": [ { "title": "Official Journal text", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "eu-ai-act-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "Binding EU regulation covering prohibited and high-risk AI uses and imposing separate obligations on providers of general-purpose AI models, with stronger duties for models presenting systemic risk.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The regulation creates these distinct risk and provider regimes.", "sources": [ { "title": "EU AI Act overview", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "eu-ai-act-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "binding law", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "It is an EU regulation directly applicable under EU law according to its staged application dates.", "sources": [ { "title": "Official Journal text", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "eu-ai-act-reach", "field": "reach", "value": "Applies within the EU and to specified providers or deployers outside the EU where the Act's territorial criteria are met.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Article 2 defines territorial scope, including specified non-EU providers and deployers.", "sources": [ { "title": "EU AI Act, Article 2", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "eu-ai-act-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The title is taken from the Official Journal text.", "sources": [ { "title": "Official Journal text", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "eu-ai-act-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "Binding EU regulation covering prohibited and high-risk AI uses and imposing separate obligations on providers of general-purpose AI models, with stronger duties for models presenting systemic risk.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The regulation creates these distinct risk and provider regimes.", "sources": [ { "title": "EU AI Act overview", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "eu-ai-act-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "binding law", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "It is an EU regulation directly applicable under EU law according to its staged application dates.", "sources": [ { "title": "Official Journal text", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "reach": { "id": "eu-ai-act-reach", "field": "reach", "value": "Applies within the EU and to specified providers or deployers outside the EU where the Act's territorial criteria are met.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Article 2 defines territorial scope, including specified non-EU providers and deployers.", "sources": [ { "title": "EU AI Act, Article 2", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng", "source_type": "legal_text" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "eu-ai-office", "slug": "eu-ai-office", "short_name": "EU AI Office", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "eu", "aliases": [ "European AI Office" ], "official_url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-office", "functions": [ "regulation", "enforcement", "evaluation", "standardisation", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "loss_of_control", "cbrn", "cyber", "model_security", "transparency", "incident_learning", "standards" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The Office is the central EU body for supervision and enforcement of the AI Act rules for general-purpose AI models." }, "claims": [ { "id": "eu-ai-office-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "European Artificial Intelligence Office", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the Commission's official institutional name.", "sources": [ { "title": "European AI Office", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-office", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "eu-ai-office-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A European Commission body that implements and enforces the AI Act's general-purpose AI model regime while developing evaluation tools, guidance and international cooperation.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The Commission describes these functions on the Office's mandate page.", "sources": [ { "title": "European AI Office", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-office", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "eu-ai-office-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "request information", "conduct model evaluations", "request corrective measures", "support enforcement of GPAI obligations" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These powers follow from the AI Act's GPAI governance and enforcement provisions.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Act governance and enforcement", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-act-governance-and-enforcement", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "eu-ai-office-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "legal-regulatory within the European Commission", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The Office is part of the Commission and exercises functions defined by EU law.", "sources": [ { "title": "European AI Office", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-office", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "eu-ai-office-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "European Artificial Intelligence Office", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the Commission's official institutional name.", "sources": [ { "title": "European AI Office", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-office", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "eu-ai-office-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A European Commission body that implements and enforces the AI Act's general-purpose AI model regime while developing evaluation tools, guidance and international cooperation.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The Commission describes these functions on the Office's mandate page.", "sources": [ { "title": "European AI Office", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-office", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "formal_powers": { "id": "eu-ai-office-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "request information", "conduct model evaluations", "request corrective measures", "support enforcement of GPAI obligations" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "These powers follow from the AI Act's GPAI governance and enforcement provisions.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Act governance and enforcement", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-act-governance-and-enforcement", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "governance_mode": { "id": "eu-ai-office-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "legal-regulatory within the European Commission", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The Office is part of the Commission and exercises functions defined by EU law.", "sources": [ { "title": "European AI Office", "url": "https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-office", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "g7-hap", "slug": "g7-hap", "short_name": "G7 HAP", "kind": "policy_process", "jurisdiction": "g7", "aliases": [ "G7 Hiroshima AI Process", "Hiroshima AI Process" ], "official_url": "https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100573471.pdf", "functions": [ "convening", "negotiation", "reporting", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "loss_of_control", "cbrn", "cyber", "model_security", "transparency", "incident_learning" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The process produced principles and a voluntary code specifically for organisations developing advanced AI systems, with an operational reporting framework." }, "claims": [ { "id": "g7-hap-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "G7 Hiroshima Artificial Intelligence Process", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the name adopted by G7 leaders.", "sources": [ { "title": "Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct", "url": "https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100573471.pdf", "source_type": "official_report" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "g7-hap-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A G7 political process that produced international guiding principles and a voluntary code of conduct for organisations developing advanced AI systems.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The G7 documents identify these outputs and their intended addressees.", "sources": [ { "title": "Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct", "url": "https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100573471.pdf", "source_type": "official_report" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "g7-hap-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "political principles and voluntary code", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The code expresses voluntary expectations rather than directly enforceable obligations.", "sources": [ { "title": "Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct", "url": "https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100573471.pdf", "source_type": "official_report" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "g7-hap-membership", "field": "membership", "value": "G7 members and the European Union provide the political sponsorship; company participation occurs through voluntary implementation and reporting.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The process is a G7 initiative and its implementation framework addresses organisations developing advanced AI.", "sources": [ { "title": "Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct", "url": "https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100573471.pdf", "source_type": "official_report" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "g7-hap-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "G7 Hiroshima Artificial Intelligence Process", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the name adopted by G7 leaders.", "sources": [ { "title": "Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct", "url": "https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100573471.pdf", "source_type": "official_report" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "g7-hap-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A G7 political process that produced international guiding principles and a voluntary code of conduct for organisations developing advanced AI systems.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The G7 documents identify these outputs and their intended addressees.", "sources": [ { "title": "Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct", "url": "https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100573471.pdf", "source_type": "official_report" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "g7-hap-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "political principles and voluntary code", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The code expresses voluntary expectations rather than directly enforceable obligations.", "sources": [ { "title": "Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct", "url": "https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100573471.pdf", "source_type": "official_report" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "membership": { "id": "g7-hap-membership", "field": "membership", "value": "G7 members and the European Union provide the political sponsorship; company participation occurs through voluntary implementation and reporting.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The process is a G7 initiative and its implementation framework addresses organisations developing advanced AI.", "sources": [ { "title": "Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct", "url": "https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/100573471.pdf", "source_type": "official_report" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "oecd-hap-reporting", "slug": "oecd-hap-reporting", "short_name": "HAIP Reporting", "kind": "mechanism", "jurisdiction": "oecd", "aliases": [ "Hiroshima AI Process Reporting Framework", "HAIP Reporting Framework" ], "official_url": "https://oecd.ai/en/transparency/overview", "functions": [ "reporting", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "transparency", "model_security", "incident_learning" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The OECD-hosted mechanism operationalises voluntary reporting by advanced-AI developers against the G7 code." }, "claims": [ { "id": "oecd-hap-reporting-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Hiroshima AI Process Reporting Framework", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the OECD platform's official name.", "sources": [ { "title": "HAIP Reporting Framework", "url": "https://oecd.ai/en/transparency/overview", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "oecd-hap-reporting-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "An OECD-hosted transparency mechanism through which participating advanced-AI organisations report how they apply the G7 Hiroshima code.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The OECD platform describes the framework and publishes company reports.", "sources": [ { "title": "HAIP Reporting Framework", "url": "https://oecd.ai/en/transparency/overview", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "oecd-hap-reporting-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "voluntary reporting mechanism", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Participation reports implementation of a voluntary code and does not itself create sanctions.", "sources": [ { "title": "HAIP Reporting Framework", "url": "https://oecd.ai/en/transparency/overview", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "oecd-hap-reporting-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Hiroshima AI Process Reporting Framework", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the OECD platform's official name.", "sources": [ { "title": "HAIP Reporting Framework", "url": "https://oecd.ai/en/transparency/overview", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "oecd-hap-reporting-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "An OECD-hosted transparency mechanism through which participating advanced-AI organisations report how they apply the G7 Hiroshima code.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The OECD platform describes the framework and publishes company reports.", "sources": [ { "title": "HAIP Reporting Framework", "url": "https://oecd.ai/en/transparency/overview", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "oecd-hap-reporting-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "voluntary reporting mechanism", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Participation reports implementation of a voluntary code and does not itself create sanctions.", "sources": [ { "title": "HAIP Reporting Framework", "url": "https://oecd.ai/en/transparency/overview", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "iso-iec-sc42", "slug": "iso-iec-sc42", "short_name": "ISO/IEC SC 42", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "global", "aliases": [ "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42", "Artificial intelligence subcommittee" ], "official_url": "https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475.html", "functions": [ "standardisation" ], "issues": [ "model_security", "transparency", "standards" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": false, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "SC 42 develops AI standards used in governance and conformity processes that can materially affect advanced-model management and evaluation." }, "claims": [ { "id": "iso-iec-sc42-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1, Subcommittee 42: Artificial intelligence", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is ISO's formal committee designation.", "sources": [ { "title": "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42", "url": "https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475.html", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "iso-iec-sc42-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "The joint ISO/IEC subcommittee developing international AI standards on concepts, management, trustworthiness, risk, data and lifecycle practices.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The committee scope and work programme cover these standardisation areas.", "sources": [ { "title": "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42", "url": "https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475.html", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "iso-iec-sc42-membership", "field": "membership", "value": "Countries participate through national standards bodies; drafting experts may come from government, industry, academia and other accredited stakeholders.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "ISO membership is organised through one recognised member body per country and committee delegations.", "sources": [ { "title": "ISO members", "url": "https://www.iso.org/about/members", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "iso-iec-sc42-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "voluntary international standards unless incorporated into law, procurement, certification or contract", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "ISO standards are voluntary by default but can acquire legal or practical force through adoption by other mechanisms.", "sources": [ { "title": "ISO standards", "url": "https://www.iso.org/standards.html", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "iso-iec-sc42-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1, Subcommittee 42: Artificial intelligence", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is ISO's formal committee designation.", "sources": [ { "title": "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42", "url": "https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475.html", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "iso-iec-sc42-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "The joint ISO/IEC subcommittee developing international AI standards on concepts, management, trustworthiness, risk, data and lifecycle practices.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The committee scope and work programme cover these standardisation areas.", "sources": [ { "title": "ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42", "url": "https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475.html", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "membership": { "id": "iso-iec-sc42-membership", "field": "membership", "value": "Countries participate through national standards bodies; drafting experts may come from government, industry, academia and other accredited stakeholders.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "ISO membership is organised through one recognised member body per country and committee delegations.", "sources": [ { "title": "ISO members", "url": "https://www.iso.org/about/members", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "iso-iec-sc42-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "voluntary international standards unless incorporated into law, procurement, certification or contract", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "ISO standards are voluntary by default but can acquire legal or practical force through adoption by other mechanisms.", "sources": [ { "title": "ISO standards", "url": "https://www.iso.org/standards.html", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "international-measurement-network", "slug": "international-measurement-network", "short_name": "Measurement Network", "kind": "mechanism", "jurisdiction": "mixed", "aliases": [ "International Network for Advanced AI Measurement, Evaluation, and Science", "International Network of AI Safety Institutes" ], "official_url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "functions": [ "evaluation", "research", "coordination", "standardisation" ], "issues": [ "loss_of_control", "cbrn", "cyber", "model_security", "standards" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The network connects public technical bodies to strengthen measurement science for advanced-AI evaluation." }, "claims": [ { "id": "measurement-network-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "International Network for Advanced AI Measurement, Evaluation, and Science", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the network's current public name.", "sources": [ { "title": "International Measurement Network", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "measurement-network-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A network of public technical bodies cooperating on advanced-AI measurement, evaluation methodology and scientific reproducibility.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "NIST describes the network's focus as strengthening the science underpinning AI evaluation.", "sources": [ { "title": "International Measurement Network", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "measurement-network-membership", "field": "membership", "value": [ "Australia", "Canada", "European Union", "France", "Japan", "Kenya", "Republic of Korea", "Singapore", "United Kingdom", "United States" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The February 2026 official NIST announcement lists ten participating jurisdictions.", "sources": [ { "title": "International Measurement Network", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "measurement-network-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "non-binding technical cooperation", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The network publishes measurement practices but does not itself regulate developers.", "sources": [ { "title": "International Measurement Network", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "measurement-network-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "International Network for Advanced AI Measurement, Evaluation, and Science", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the network's current public name.", "sources": [ { "title": "International Measurement Network", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "measurement-network-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A network of public technical bodies cooperating on advanced-AI measurement, evaluation methodology and scientific reproducibility.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "NIST describes the network's focus as strengthening the science underpinning AI evaluation.", "sources": [ { "title": "International Measurement Network", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "membership": { "id": "measurement-network-membership", "field": "membership", "value": [ "Australia", "Canada", "European Union", "France", "Japan", "Kenya", "Republic of Korea", "Singapore", "United Kingdom", "United States" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The February 2026 official NIST announcement lists ten participating jurisdictions.", "sources": [ { "title": "International Measurement Network", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "measurement-network-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "non-binding technical cooperation", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The network publishes measurement practices but does not itself regulate developers.", "sources": [ { "title": "International Measurement Network", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "latest_update": { "schema_version": 1, "id": "2026-02-13-network-evaluation-practices", "subjects": [ "international-measurement-network", "us-caisi" ], "event_date": "2026-02-13", "published_date": "2026-02-13", "title": "Network publishes consensus areas for automated evaluations", "summary": "The international measurement network published shared practices and open questions for automated capability evaluations, turning its broad cooperation mandate into a more concrete technical output.", "selection_reason": "material_publication", "sources": [ { "title": "Consensus areas on automated evaluations", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2026/02/international-network-advanced-ai-measurement-evaluation-and-science", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "generated_on": "2026-07-27", "review_status": "reviewed", "stale_after": "2026-08-13", "changes_stable_fact": false }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "nist", "slug": "nist", "short_name": "NIST", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "usa", "aliases": [ "National Institute of Standards and Technology" ], "official_url": "https://www.nist.gov/", "functions": [ "standardisation", "research", "evaluation", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "cyber", "model_security", "standards" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": false, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "NIST houses CAISI and develops measurement and standards infrastructure applied directly to advanced AI systems." }, "claims": [ { "id": "nist-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "National Institute of Standards and Technology", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the agency's official name.", "sources": [ { "title": "NIST", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "nist-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A US Department of Commerce agency for measurement science, standards and technology; it houses CAISI and produces widely used AI risk-management guidance.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "NIST's official description and CAISI page establish these roles.", "sources": [ { "title": "NIST", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" }, { "title": "CAISI", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "nist-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "public measurement and voluntary standards infrastructure", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "NIST develops measurement methods and standards but is not a general AI enforcement regulator.", "sources": [ { "title": "NIST", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "nist-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "National Institute of Standards and Technology", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the agency's official name.", "sources": [ { "title": "NIST", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "nist-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A US Department of Commerce agency for measurement science, standards and technology; it houses CAISI and produces widely used AI risk-management guidance.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "NIST's official description and CAISI page establish these roles.", "sources": [ { "title": "NIST", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" }, { "title": "CAISI", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "governance_mode": { "id": "nist-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "public measurement and voluntary standards infrastructure", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "NIST develops measurement methods and standards but is not a general AI enforcement regulator.", "sources": [ { "title": "NIST", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "shanghai-ai-lab", "slug": "shanghai-ai-lab", "short_name": "Shanghai AI Lab", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "china", "aliases": [ "Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory", "上海人工智能实验室", "SHLAB" ], "official_url": "https://www.shlab.org.cn/", "functions": [ "research", "evaluation", "standardisation" ], "issues": [ "model_security", "open_weights", "standards" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The state-backed laboratory develops foundation models and evaluation platforms used on advanced models." }, "claims": [ { "id": "shanghai-ai-lab-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the laboratory's English name.", "sources": [ { "title": "Shanghai AI Laboratory", "url": "https://www.shlab.org.cn/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "shanghai-ai-lab-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A state-backed national-level research institution that develops foundation models, evaluation platforms and AI-safety research; it is both a model developer and a source of benchmarks.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Official institutional descriptions and the laboratory's published work establish this combined role.", "sources": [ { "title": "Shanghai government description", "url": "https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw4411/20240704/ce601310c22741519e734cb70f707432.html", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "shanghai-ai-lab-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "state-backed research and industrial-development institution without direct regulatory powers", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Its role is research, model development and evaluation rather than administrative enforcement.", "sources": [ { "title": "Shanghai government description", "url": "https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw4411/20240704/ce601310c22741519e734cb70f707432.html", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "shanghai-ai-lab-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the laboratory's English name.", "sources": [ { "title": "Shanghai AI Laboratory", "url": "https://www.shlab.org.cn/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "shanghai-ai-lab-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A state-backed national-level research institution that develops foundation models, evaluation platforms and AI-safety research; it is both a model developer and a source of benchmarks.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Official institutional descriptions and the laboratory's published work establish this combined role.", "sources": [ { "title": "Shanghai government description", "url": "https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw4411/20240704/ce601310c22741519e734cb70f707432.html", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "governance_mode": { "id": "shanghai-ai-lab-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "state-backed research and industrial-development institution without direct regulatory powers", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "Its role is research, model development and evaluation rather than administrative enforcement.", "sources": [ { "title": "Shanghai government description", "url": "https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw4411/20240704/ce601310c22741519e734cb70f707432.html", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "tc260", "slug": "tc260", "short_name": "TC260", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "china", "aliases": [ "National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee", "全国网络安全标准化技术委员会" ], "official_url": "https://www.tc260.org.cn/", "functions": [ "standardisation", "advice", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "cyber", "model_security", "open_weights", "standards" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "TC260 issues technical documents and standards that directly address foundation-model and AI-security governance." }, "claims": [ { "id": "tc260-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the committee's standard English name.", "sources": [ { "title": "TC260", "url": "https://www.tc260.org.cn/", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "tc260-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "China's national cybersecurity standardisation committee, producing standards and technical governance documents including the AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "TC260 and CAC identify the framework as a national cybersecurity standards technical document.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "tc260-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "state-directed technical standardisation with government, research and industry participation", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The committee operates in the national cybersecurity standards system and convenes technical contributors under state guidance.", "sources": [ { "title": "TC260", "url": "https://www.tc260.org.cn/", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "tc260-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "National Information Security Standardization Technical Committee", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the committee's standard English name.", "sources": [ { "title": "TC260", "url": "https://www.tc260.org.cn/", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "tc260-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "China's national cybersecurity standardisation committee, producing standards and technical governance documents including the AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "TC260 and CAC identify the framework as a national cybersecurity standards technical document.", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "governance_mode": { "id": "tc260-mode", "field": "governance_mode", "value": "state-directed technical standardisation with government, research and industry participation", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The committee operates in the national cybersecurity standards system and convenes technical contributors under state guidance.", "sources": [ { "title": "TC260", "url": "https://www.tc260.org.cn/", "source_type": "standard_body" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "latest_update": { "schema_version": 1, "id": "2025-09-15-china-framework-2-release", "subjects": [ "china-ai-safety-framework-2", "cac", "tc260" ], "event_date": "2025-09-15", "published_date": "2025-09-15", "title": "China releases AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0", "summary": "Version 2.0 updated China's state-backed technical risk taxonomy, introduced a qualitative risk-grading approach and revised proposed governance measures.", "selection_reason": "official_policy", "sources": [ { "title": "AI Safety Governance Framework 2.0 release", "url": "https://www.cac.gov.cn/2025-09/15/c_1759653448369123.htm", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "generated_on": "2026-07-27", "review_status": "reviewed", "stale_after": "2026-03-15", "changes_stable_fact": true }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "uk-aisi", "slug": "uk-aisi", "short_name": "UK AISI", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "uk", "aliases": [ "AI Security Institute", "UK AI Security Institute" ], "official_url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/", "functions": [ "evaluation", "research", "advice", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "loss_of_control", "autonomous_r_and_d", "cbrn", "cyber", "model_security", "open_weights" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "The institute evaluates advanced models and has documented testing relationships and joint evaluations involving frontier developers and models." }, "claims": [ { "id": "uk-aisi-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "United Kingdom Artificial Intelligence Security Institute", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The institute uses this name in its official materials.", "sources": [ { "title": "UK AISI", "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "uk-aisi-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A UK government technical institute researching and testing advanced AI models, including misuse capabilities, safeguards and loss-of-control indicators.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This describes the evaluation and research mandate published by the institute.", "sources": [ { "title": "Introducing the AI Security Institute", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-institute-overview/introducing-the-ai-safety-institute", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "uk-aisi-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "research", "model evaluation", "technical advice" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The institute evaluates and advises but does not license or certify frontier-model releases.", "sources": [ { "title": "Introducing the AI Security Institute", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-institute-overview/introducing-the-ai-safety-institute", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "uk-aisi-fragility", "field": "political_fragility", "value": "Its mandate, resourcing and voluntary-access model can change through executive and budget decisions without a change in legal status.", "evidence_status": "inferred", "confidence": "medium", "rationale": "This is an institutional assessment based on its executive location and absence of independent statutory enforcement authority.", "sources": [ { "title": "Introducing the AI Security Institute", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-institute-overview/introducing-the-ai-safety-institute", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "uk-aisi-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "United Kingdom Artificial Intelligence Security Institute", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The institute uses this name in its official materials.", "sources": [ { "title": "UK AISI", "url": "https://www.aisi.gov.uk/", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "uk-aisi-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A UK government technical institute researching and testing advanced AI models, including misuse capabilities, safeguards and loss-of-control indicators.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This describes the evaluation and research mandate published by the institute.", "sources": [ { "title": "Introducing the AI Security Institute", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-institute-overview/introducing-the-ai-safety-institute", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "formal_powers": { "id": "uk-aisi-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "research", "model evaluation", "technical advice" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The institute evaluates and advises but does not license or certify frontier-model releases.", "sources": [ { "title": "Introducing the AI Security Institute", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-institute-overview/introducing-the-ai-safety-institute", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "political_fragility": { "id": "uk-aisi-fragility", "field": "political_fragility", "value": "Its mandate, resourcing and voluntary-access model can change through executive and budget decisions without a change in legal status.", "evidence_status": "inferred", "confidence": "medium", "rationale": "This is an institutional assessment based on its executive location and absence of independent statutory enforcement authority.", "sources": [ { "title": "Introducing the AI Security Institute", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-institute-overview/introducing-the-ai-safety-institute", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "latest_update": { "schema_version": 1, "id": "2026-07-23-kimi-k3-joint-evaluation", "subjects": [ "uk-aisi", "us-caisi" ], "event_date": "2026-07-23", "published_date": "2026-07-23", "title": "Joint preliminary assessment of Kimi K3 cyber capabilities", "summary": "UK AISI and US CAISI published a joint preliminary cyber-capability assessment of Moonshot AI's open-weight Kimi K3 model, demonstrating an operational cross-border evaluation relationship.", "selection_reason": "evaluation_practice", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI news and updates", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "generated_on": "2026-07-27", "review_status": "reviewed", "stale_after": "2026-10-23", "changes_stable_fact": false }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "un-scientific-panel", "slug": "un-scientific-panel", "short_name": "UN AI Panel", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "un", "aliases": [ "Independent International Scientific Panel on AI" ], "official_url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "functions": [ "research", "advice", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "loss_of_control", "cbrn", "cyber", "open_weights", "fundamental_rights" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": false, "rationale": "The UN scientific mechanism is mandated to synthesise evidence on AI opportunities, risks and impacts, including advanced-system risks." }, "claims": [ { "id": "un-panel-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the name established through the Global Digital Compact follow-up.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "un-panel-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A UN scientific mechanism intended to synthesise evidence on AI opportunities, risks and impacts and inform global AI-governance deliberation.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The UN's official description assigns the panel an evidence-assessment function.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "un-panel-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "scientific advice without direct enforcement power", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The panel informs political dialogue and does not regulate states or developers.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "un-panel-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the name established through the Global Digital Compact follow-up.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "un-panel-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A UN scientific mechanism intended to synthesise evidence on AI opportunities, risks and impacts and inform global AI-governance deliberation.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The UN's official description assigns the panel an evidence-assessment function.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "un-panel-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "scientific advice without direct enforcement power", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The panel informs political dialogue and does not regulate states or developers.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "un-global-dialogue", "slug": "un-global-dialogue", "short_name": "UN Global Dialogue", "kind": "policy_process", "jurisdiction": "un", "aliases": [ "Global Dialogue on AI Governance" ], "official_url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "functions": [ "convening", "negotiation", "coordination" ], "issues": [ "loss_of_control", "cbrn", "cyber", "open_weights", "fundamental_rights", "standards" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": false, "rationale": "The dialogue is a global political venue whose mandate includes governance of advanced AI risks and international cooperation." }, "claims": [ { "id": "un-dialogue-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the UN mechanism's official name.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "un-dialogue-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A UN political dialogue intended to provide an inclusive venue for international discussion of AI governance, drawing on evidence from the scientific panel.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The Global Digital Compact establishes the dialogue as a global governance forum linked to the panel.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "un-dialogue-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "non-binding political dialogue", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The dialogue can create shared understanding and political momentum but has no direct enforcement authority.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "un-dialogue-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the UN mechanism's official name.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "un-dialogue-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "A UN political dialogue intended to provide an inclusive venue for international discussion of AI governance, drawing on evidence from the scientific panel.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The Global Digital Compact establishes the dialogue as a global governance forum linked to the panel.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "legal_force": { "id": "un-dialogue-force", "field": "legal_force", "value": "non-binding political dialogue", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The dialogue can create shared understanding and political momentum but has no direct enforcement authority.", "sources": [ { "title": "UN AI institutions", "url": "https://www.un.org/global-digital-compact/en/ai", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" }, { "schema_version": 1, "id": "us-caisi", "slug": "us-caisi", "short_name": "US CAISI", "kind": "organisation", "jurisdiction": "usa", "aliases": [ "Center for AI Standards and Innovation", "US AISI" ], "official_url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "functions": [ "evaluation", "research", "standardisation", "coordination", "advice" ], "issues": [ "cbrn", "cyber", "model_security", "open_weights", "standards" ], "inclusion": { "frontier_explicit": true, "lifecycle_leverage": true, "documented_application": true, "rationale": "CAISI conducts advanced-model evaluations and develops guidelines and voluntary standards for securing commercial AI systems." }, "claims": [ { "id": "us-caisi-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Center for AI Standards and Innovation", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the official NIST name used since 2025.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "us-caisi-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "NIST's advanced-AI testing and standards centre, serving as a US government contact point for collaborative evaluation and research on commercial AI systems.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The centre's official page states this role and publishes model evaluations.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "us-caisi-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "evaluation", "measurement research", "guideline and voluntary-standard development", "industry collaboration" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The centre has technical and coordination functions but no general power to compel frontier-model access or sanction developers.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, { "id": "us-caisi-fragility", "field": "political_fragility", "value": "Its 2025 renaming and changed policy framing show sensitivity to executive priorities even while its formal placement within NIST remained.", "evidence_status": "inferred", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "NIST records the re-establishment of the former AISI as CAISI by the Commerce Secretary.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI news archive", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news-updates/tag/2810121", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } ], "attributes": { "full_name": { "id": "us-caisi-full-name", "field": "full_name", "value": "Center for AI Standards and Innovation", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "This is the official NIST name used since 2025.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "summary": { "id": "us-caisi-summary", "field": "summary", "value": "NIST's advanced-AI testing and standards centre, serving as a US government contact point for collaborative evaluation and research on commercial AI systems.", "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The centre's official page states this role and publishes model evaluations.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "formal_powers": { "id": "us-caisi-powers", "field": "formal_powers", "value": [ "evaluation", "measurement research", "guideline and voluntary-standard development", "industry collaboration" ], "evidence_status": "factual", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "The centre has technical and coordination functions but no general power to compel frontier-model access or sanction developers.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" }, "political_fragility": { "id": "us-caisi-fragility", "field": "political_fragility", "value": "Its 2025 renaming and changed policy framing show sensitivity to executive priorities even while its formal placement within NIST remained.", "evidence_status": "inferred", "confidence": "high", "rationale": "NIST records the re-establishment of the former AISI as CAISI by the Commerce Secretary.", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI news archive", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news-updates/tag/2810121", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "verified_on": "2026-07-27", "review_level": "A" } }, "latest_update": { "schema_version": 1, "id": "2026-07-23-kimi-k3-joint-evaluation", "subjects": [ "uk-aisi", "us-caisi" ], "event_date": "2026-07-23", "published_date": "2026-07-23", "title": "Joint preliminary assessment of Kimi K3 cyber capabilities", "summary": "UK AISI and US CAISI published a joint preliminary cyber-capability assessment of Moonshot AI's open-weight Kimi K3 model, demonstrating an operational cross-border evaluation relationship.", "selection_reason": "evaluation_practice", "sources": [ { "title": "CAISI news and updates", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/caisi", "source_type": "official_page" } ], "generated_on": "2026-07-27", "review_status": "reviewed", "stale_after": "2026-10-23", "changes_stable_fact": false }, "verification_state": "current", "oldest_verification": "2026-07-27" } ] }